Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?!

Software Test Account (softtest@wu1.wl.aecl.ca)
Sat, 25 Mar 1995 16:03:15 -0600 (CST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Pete Hartman: "Re: MIME question..."
Previous message: sameer: "Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?!"
In reply to: sameer: "Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?!"
Next in thread: Jake Hill: "Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?!"

On Sat, 25 Mar 1995, sameer wrote:

> ftp.csua.berkeley.edu:/pub/cypherpunks/ciphers/rc4.c
> ftp.csua.berkeley.edu:/pub/cypherpunks/ciphers/rc4.h
> 
>
That's all there is to the routine?
Surely there is more to creating such a secure key?

Just a hunch? 

Erik
     ____       _____    _______   __     Erik Lindquist  
    / _  |     / ___/   / _____/  /  /    Systems Administrator 
   / /_| |    / /__    / /       /  /     AECL Whiteshell Laboratories
  /  __  |   / ___/   / /       /  /      VOICE: (204) 753-2311x3145  
 / /   | |  / /____  / /_____  /  /_____  FAX:   (204) 753-2455 
/_/    |_| /______/ /_______/ /________/  E-mail: lindquie@wu1.wl.aecl.ca

Next message: Pete Hartman: "Re: MIME question..."
Previous message: sameer: "Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?!"
In reply to: sameer: "Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?!"
Next in thread: Jake Hill: "Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?!"